Subspace; Dark Matter and The Space Time Contiuum
Dark Matter and The Space-Time Continuum
Author, Eric Sabo, East Haddam, CT
June 20, 2008
After pondering the Sub-Atomic Particles paper, it seems an avenue to answer a myriad of questions has arisen. From the NASA WMAP website;
Until about thirty years ago, astronomers thought that the universe was composed almost entirely of this "baryonic matter", ordinary atoms. However, in the past few decades, there has been ever more evidence accumulating that suggests there is something in the universe that we can not see, perhaps some new form of matter.
The avenue opened is with the description of the Muon decay process suggested in the Sub-Atomic Particles paper. That suggestion was that a cloud, mist, or dust of free halflets might be able to exist for a short time, held in suspension by each other.
See below drawing;
What if that dust of free halflets is permanent, and they are; That’s where all the Dark Matter is! The halflet dust is where any matter that cannot be accounted for exsists. It is unobservable because it has Zero net charge and Zero energy. In the tradition of science fiction becoming science fact, we’re going to call the halflet dust, Subspace! Now, what if the halflets were not free, but paired and bound. They would be photons with zero frequency and zero energy.
What actually makes up the fabric of the space time!
1. Either way, the halflets are held in suspension by each other. 2. It would all be unobservable because it has Zero net charge and Zero energy. 3. Density of the medium would vary and like all systems seeks equilibrium. 4. The subspace medium is all pervasive right down to the space between atoms. 5. It’s why any thing accelerating towards the speed of light gains mass! 6. It’s why light travelling past a star curves around the star. 7. It’s why light has a speed limit. Dark Matter in deep space, look like the below but three dimensional; A photon passing through; A magnetic wave propagating; Subspace would vary in density near massive bodies that have a wide variety of nuclear reactions and all sorts of decays happening. Stellar objects would be the greatest contributors to the subspace medium. Near a stellar object that is spewing all the normal radiation plus dark matter, the Subspace medium density is greater. This would make the Space Time Continuum (Subspace) appear to a Photon travelling near a star to be curved. So now, the Subspace medium near our 250MW loss Nuc plant in the Sub-Atomic Particles paper would become; Any particle travelling at high speed collides with and collects Dark Matter, gaining mass. But, it’s all electromagnetic because when the Dark Matter is collided with it’s halflets split up and form a shell around the colliding object. An electron, for example is shown below; And when the above electron approaches and encounters a nucleus, all the excess negative halflets are absorbed by the nucleus. This separates the electromagnetic from the electrostatic, leaving a positron and an electron. (This will be better explained in my next paper.) My apologies for the science fiction terminology, but science fiction in many cases becomes science fact. And, subspace is easier to say than “the space-time continuum”. It would seem plausible that there is enough Subspace Medium (dark matter) to fill a solar system or even a galaxy. But between galaxies? Thank you for your time, Eric Sabo 
This might explain the fundamental difference between matter and antimatter. Antimatter particles are like ghost particles. That’s why there are not many in exsistence.
So then, to travel at speeds in excess of “c” all one needs to do is move subspace out of the way. Plow the road, as it were. 
Original Space Time Page
The Space Time Continuum. It has an ominous ring to it. For most what immediately comes to mind is; “The Flux Capacitor, Marteeeee!!” But it really does not involve any Flux Capacitors. The Space Time Continuum is the three dimensions of length, width, and height combined with time. We live in a four dimensional universe. I have spent some time trying to perceive my own existence from a four dimensional perspective. I was unsuccessful. Apparently, we are unable to think four dimensionally. I assume it is because we are three dimensional creatures.
The Space Time Continuum, however, is what the universe is. It is not uniform or inflexible. One example is that if you fly to the nearest star and it takes you fifty years, when you get back, everybody you left will be dead and gone. That’s because the faster you travel, the passage of time slows for you and your “Frame of Reference”. I have to ask, what possible connection could there be between how fast you travel and the passage of time!?
Well, I believe the answer to that question lies in a paper written by Walter Babin based in Rodney, On.
The speed of light = 186,000 miles per second in a vacuum. This number is represented simply by the letter “c”. It is a constant, but not all the time. For example, Walter points out that all light propagates independently from every frame of reference. That means if you are traveling in a spacecraft faster than c, once the light in your craft goes out the window, it will be trailing behind you at c. And if you are traveling to a planet, those on the planet will never see you coming. Also, once you arrive at that planet, then they will see your light and then you will appear to be moving away because the light particles you deposited closest to them will arrive first and the rest later.
What does this have to do with the passage of time? Well, we have to determine what it is that actually sets the rate of passage of time. What is the one thing that is constant in any Frame of Reference? It is not c because if your craft is traveling over c, some of the light is really traveling at 2 x c, depending on it direction of travel in relation to yours. The one constant is, in fact, is the speed at which the electrons orbit the atoms in your “Frame of Reference”. And that speed is as follows;
The September 2004, issue of NATIONAL GEOGRAPHIC, reports that German and Austrian physicists have used photons spaced at the ultraviolet portion of the eM spectrum to measure the Hydrogen atom's electron's orbital velocity (which is to say all K shell electrons in all atoms.) An electron makes one orbital revolution around the nucleus of the Hydrogen atom (a single proton normally) in 150 attaseconds. An attasecond is one quintillionth of a second or 10 to the minus 18th power seconds).
It’s probably realistically c. What I am suggesting is that the speed at which the electrons orbit the atoms in your “Frame of Reference” sets the rate of which time passes. And, the reason the passage of time slows as your velocity approaches c, is that a physical conflict arises between the Universal Constant of c, and the compound velocities of the electrons orbiting the atoms in your “Frame of Reference”. Walter’s paper suggests that the big event is not a c, but at 2c. That’s where all the compound velocities of the electrons orbiting the atoms in your “Frame of Reference” are at least at c. I’m suggesting that 2c is where time comes to a dead stop. After 2c, what happens is in question and I’d say all bets are off on time reversal. So, that means if you flew away from Earth at 2c for a few hours and back, you would arrive exactly at the time you left. And, you had better be careful not to collide with yourself.
Traveling faster than c is important if you want to get any where in the galaxy in a reasonable amount of time. At c, the nearest star is a four year one way trip. Traveling faster than c is impossible because your spacecraft creates an increasing inertial field the faster you go. It eventually approaches infinity making it impossible to go any faster.
So, how does one travel faster than c if the inertial field is approaches infinity? All one has to do is build a spacecraft equipped with a field generator that generates a field that cancels the inertial field of the craft. It might require an increasing amount of power as your velocity increases, but maybe not, once the initial field is cancelled. This would allow the craft to travel with ease at any velocity making propulsion secondary. I suppose the field generator would be called an Inertial Damper. The technology does not exist yet, but it probably will involve Tesla coils and maybe even Flux Capacitors to shift the canceling field out of phase.
It might all sound like science fiction, but thank you for your time.
Some of Walter Babin's other papers are;
Papers ~ Walter Babin
Mar., 15, 2006: Relativistic Transformation Equations: Additional Support for the Existence of Dual States [PDF]
Feb, 15, 2006: Relativity Redux: The World Year of Physics Russian Translation [PDF]
Feb, 4, 2005: The Grand Unified Field Theory
Mar. 7, 2003: Superluminal Speeds and Superconductivity
July 9, 2002: The Synthesis of Mechanics, Relativity and Quantum Physics
Excerpts - The Synthesis:
· A Rational Basis for Special Relativity Russian Translation [PDF]
· Dual States of Matter and Field (Antigravity)
· The New Mechanics - Single Fundamental Particle
Earlier Papers
An Analysis of The Theoretical Foundations of Special Relativity
Special Relativity and the Sagnac Effect
Relativity and Electrodynamics
