Gravity and The Unified Theory
The Physical Means of How Gravity Works and at last, The Unified Theory

Home Page - December 25, 2005
The last obstacle to developing The Unified Theory has always been solving the mystery of how Gravity works. This site is the result of 33 years of observation and reflection of how things work and why they work the way they do. The gravitational explanation contained is correct and thus, allows for the rest to logically follow.
Updates
Home page 7/30/2008,  The Unified Theory page 7/14/2008
Subspace (Dark Matter and the Space Time Continuum) 7/30/2008

Gravity Quick Version

Author: Eric Sabo East Haddam, CT

 Dec 25, 2005

Updated July 11, 2008

 

I estimate that 99.99% of the people on this planet of 6.6 Billion are totally unaware that the mechanism of how gravity works remains to be explained. To most, you drop a pan on your foot, and it hurts. It’s a sad statement.

Today, everyone is a specialist, concerned with their own particular area of interest. Being a jack of all somewhat fairly technical trades and master of none, I have always been concerned with and observant of all things around me. Gravity has always been a mystery and it seems ridiculous that in 2005, now 2008, that nobody has a clue. This being unacceptable, I took on the challenge and here it is;

Observe how thin the atmosphere is compared to the Earth's diameter. Gravity is not a very strong force after all.
Photo Courtesy of NASA's Visible Earth

Gravity is the weak electrostatic attraction between atoms.

Gravity is a simple Electro Mechanical System.
The attractive forces are greater than the repulsive between atoms because the attractive work together. It's like two against one. 

    To experience the effect, get two magnets and push the two N together. Notice how they deflect.

Now try N to S and you will see they are always locked in
because they work together.

Electrostatics behave in the same manner.

Most will disagree with my assumption that attraction is greater than repulsion. I received this argument;

“Orbits are an equilibrium of forces. One aspect of inequality is mass differences, but the forces are equal and opposite in Newton's mechanics”.

That is correct inside any particular atom, but when outside the atom and other atoms are involved,
things change. Because the electromagnetic (electrostatic) range is infinite,
there is a very slight attraction between atoms.
 

For simplicity sake we will have to start with some Hydrogen atoms.

Observe this example of a two, three, and four Hydrogen Atom gravitational system;   



    Now, multiply this concept to equal the number of atoms in the Earth
and everything on it, and there you have it! Gravity. Every atom in a system is interconnected.

Because the attraction decreases by the square as the distance doubles, the atoms closest to you under your feet are having more effect than those on the other side of the planet. If you are driving your car from say, New Haven, CT, to Ocean City, MD, a whole group of different atoms are taking over as you travel along.

And, as you travel away from the Earth, it all appears as a point source.

I have been selling this idea for over two years at www.howgravityworks.org with little success. One trusted and valued colleague offered it as a “residual”. I like that viewpoint. When I asked him “Why does no one see this mechanism as a viable explanation?” He offered;

“Whether it’s a vested interest or Pavlovian response, they cling to their beliefs like religious zealots.”

Those are powerful words that reflect a truthful perspective. I, myself think two things;

1.      Nobody actually cares to give it a thought, and if you do, you’re considered “crazy”.“Some rocket scientist will come up with the answer.” In my experience, most rocket scientists are good at rocket science but fail in the “common sense” department.

2.      The current thinking in this area is built on 17th century thinking.

There is always the possibility that Albert Einstein was correct when he said;

Only two things are infinite, the universe and human stupidity, and I'm not sure about the former.”

Albert Einstein also said; “I should have been a plumber.” Recently, many have begun to question if Einstein was totally accurate in some of his work. This may be true because what he should have said is; “I should have been an electrician” because the best programmer I know in the world of DDC building automation and control, has this; 

            “There’s nothin’ dumber than a plumber.”
(He’s a fairly intolerant individual)

See “The Unified Theory” on my site for more.

Thank you for your time

Eric Sabo

HGW.org is an organization dedicated to advancements in Science and the Arts.